Home :: Reviews & Articles :: Forum :: Info :: Sponsors :: Links :: Shop :: F@H :: Newsletter
Bigbruin.com Logo
  Ad
Ad
ECS GF7100PVT-M GeForce 7100 mATX Motherboard Select the Dark Theme Select the Light Theme
Author: Jason Kohrs
Manufacturer: ECS
Source: ECS
Purchase: PriceGrabber
Comment or Question: Post Here
Page: 6 of 7 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
ECS GF7100PVT-M GeForce 7100 mATX Motherboard
March 31, 2008

Testing (continued):

Next up is FutureMark's 3DMark06, a popular benchmark for analyzing the performance of video cards. While it wasn't pretty to watch, the integrated graphics controllers were able to get through the tests at 1280x1024, no anti-aliasing, and with optimal filtering. Higher values are better.

chart

While people expect their high end graphics cards to pump out 10,000 or more Marks in this test, here we see that the GF7100PVT-M wins with just 383. If you haven't figured it out yet, you will not be gaming with the integrated graphics on this motherboard, but you can always pop your favorite high end card into the PCI Express x16 slot if you require more horsepower.

The next benchmark is Lavalys' Everest Ultimate Edition 4.20. Four sets of results are provided which gauge performance in terms of memory read speed (in MB/s), memory write speed (in MB/s), memory copy speed (in MB/s), and memory latency (in ns). Higher values are better for the first three values, while lower values are desirable for latency.

chart

Here we see that something other than a single channel memory controller must be impacting the performance of the two memory modules installed. Sure, the results are much lower than what you would expect on a higher end dual channel board, but they're even lower than the same kit installed on the older ECS motherboard. The RC410L/800-M also has a single channel memory controller, and other than the latency value, it beats the newer board with ease.

SimpliSoftware's HD Tach RW 3.0.4.0 is the final test to consider, and it may be the feel good story of the review. Of the four results provided, higher values are better for Burst Speed and Average Read Speed, while lower values are better for CPU Usage and Access Time.

chart

While the 3Gbps drive attached didn't quite burst to a speed as high as you might expect, the average read speed was quite respectable. With a strong showing with a single drive, I would hope to see fast transfer rates if the onboard controller was configured to use a few drives in RAID 0, 0+1, or 5.

« Back :: 1 :: 2 :: 3 :: 4 :: 5 :: 6 :: 7 :: Next »
Google Search

Advertisement

In The Forum Forum RSS Feed
» Sequential Number Image Game
» My money pit.
» Cleveland Air Show
» doh! Broke the bank today..
» COD 5
» Cooler Master CSX Spring Contest
» Forum Index

Recent Content Content RSS Feed
» Thermaltake Armor+ MX Mid Tower Case
» Thermaltake DuOrb Heatpipe CPU Cooler
» ASUS TOP 512MB GeForce 9600GT
» Maxtor BlackArmor 160GB Portable Drive
» Moneual MonCaso 972S HTPC Case
» Sapphire Radeon HD4870 512MB
» Content Index

Content Categories
Articles Articles
Audio Audio
Cases Cases
Cooling Cooling
Electronics Electronics
Input Devices Input Devices
Memory Memory
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Modifications Modifications
Motherboards Motherboards
Power Power
Storage Storage
Systems Systems
Video Video

Links Worth Clicking

Xoxide - Your Gaming Headquarters    

Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Bigbruin.com - All rights reserved